Categories
Future List Honorees
August 22, 2024
Explore the expertise of Shawnna Mullenax, a social scientist at PSB Insights, specializing in data-driven insights and innovative research methodologies.
Editor’s Note: The following interview features a 2024 Greenbook Future List honoree, Shawnna Mullenax. The Greenbook Future List recognizes leadership, professional growth, personal integrity, passion, and excellence in the next generation of consumer insights and marketing professionals within the first 10 years of their careers.
Shawnna Mullenax, a dedicated social scientist holding a PhD in political science, is a leading figure at PSB Insights. In her role as Vice President, she spearheads both quantitative and qualitative studies, generating data-driven insights that cater to a wide array of clients spanning public, private, and non-profit sectors. Shawnna's forte lies in translating intricate methodological findings into clear and compelling narratives, drawing upon a mix of survey and non-survey data from diverse sources.
On a personal note, Shawnna, a first-generation college student from Appalachia, recounts her journey to being considered for the prestigious Greenbook Future List as a testament to her unwavering determination and resilience. As an alumna of the McNair Scholars program, she champions underrepresented students by providing research opportunities, mentorship, and academic support, fueling her dedication to promoting inclusivity and empowerment within the insights industry.
Shawnna at PSB Insights founded the Methods Reading Group to connect early-career professionals and encourage continuous learning. With expertise in political and social science methodologies, as VP, she drives impactful insights for clients in multiple sectors, specializing in projects such as the 2020 Decennial Census Communications Campaign and partnerships with the Pew Research Center. Her role underscores a dedication to research excellence by enhancing surveys, leading focus groups, and innovating collaborative efforts with organizations like the Pew Research Center.
When I'm not researching or chasing my twin toddlers, one of my growing interests is gardening. I've always wanted to have a big vegetable garden, but this wasn't feasible living in apartments in Boulder, CO and Washington D.C. When I moved to Wisconsin during the pandemic, I finally got the opportunity!
My new home had previously been owned by a Master Gardener. The house is surrounded by beautifully curated perennial flower beds, a testament to the previous owner's expertise and dedication. I really wanted to be able to maintain these gardens but had a hard time distinguishing between an intentional flower and a weed!
In addition to preserving the existing flower beds, I really wanted to grow a vegetable garden. I envisioned making the most of Wisconsin's beautiful summers by spending time outside in the garden, a nice contrast to the long winters. With this goal in mind, I enrolled in a Master Gardener course at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.
The course was a fascinating journey into a world completely different from market research. It was refreshing and humbling to learn something new, especially when many of my initial instincts about gardening proved to be so off base. My experience of being a novice again, of learning through trial and error, has been both fun and enlightening. As summer approaches, I look forward to expanding my garden beyond the few tomato and basil plants I managed last year. I am excited to experiment with more complex crops, learn from my failures, and improve my gardening skills for the following year.
This is a question I’m asked a lot by other PhDs looking to transition from academia to industry. I usually tell them that insights is a dynamic field, characterized by the unique opportunity it offers to make a significant impact on businesses and society at large through research. A few things pieces of advice I have for folks looking to start a career in insights include:
Starting a career in insights requires a blend of technical skills, interpersonal abilities, curiosity, and an open mind. Leverage your unique skills and maintain a passion for asking questions and listening to the answers. With these qualities, you can make a real difference, not just in the business world, but in people's lives.
Through my involvement in the American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) and beyond, I am focusing on the crucial need for organizations to prioritize hard-to-reach audiences in their research. It's not merely a matter of improving methodologies, but a fundamental shift in approach that recognizes the value and importance of these underrepresented groups.
One of the significant issues I am trying to address is the tendency for organizations to overlook these audiences or treat them as an afterthought. This often results in a lack of cultural relevance in the research materials and methods used, leading to inadequate representation and understanding of these communities.
I strongly advocate for the transcreation of research materials, rather than simple translation. The Census Bureau's approach during their 2020 Census campaign serves as a prime example of this. They understood the importance of developing research and creative content that didn't just speak the language of the target audience, but also reflected their culture, values, and reality.
Many companies are falling short in this regard, but there are exceptions. Target, for instance, is often mentioned by Latinos as a company that makes them feel seen and heard in their marketing. This shows the power and impact of culturally relevant research and marketing strategies.
By prioritizing hard-to-reach audiences and investing in culturally relevant research methods, we can produce more comprehensive and accurate outcomes. This not only enhances the quality of our work but also its relevance and impact in shaping policies and practices that affect all members of our society.
If there's one aspect of the insights industry I would change, it would be the often-siloed approach to quantitative and qualitative research. In my experience, we generate the best insights when quantitative and qualitative methods are used together. Yet, in conferences, panels, and organizations, these two approaches often exist in separate spheres. This separation isn't unique to market research; it permeates the social sciences too, creating an unnecessary divide that can hinder the depth of our understanding.
In my experience, the most insightful projects are those that employ both qualitative and quantitative methods. For instance, conducting in-depth interviews to inform a survey questionnaire ensures we capture concepts that resonate with the target audience. Interpreting survey results and then returning to qualitative methods to fill in gaps allows us to challenge our assumptions and provide more comprehensive insights.
A few things we can do to bridge the divide between qualitative and quantitative include:
Challenging Specialization Norms: In academia and professional settings, researchers often specialize in either quantitative or qualitative methods. While specialization has its merits, it can inadvertently create barriers between these two crucial aspects of research. We need to challenge this norm and promote a more holistic approach to research that values and utilizes both quantitative and qualitative techniques.
Advocating for Change: Breaking down these silos requires not just individual effort but systemic change. We need to advocate for this shift at all levels - from educational institutions that train future researchers to professional organizations that set industry standards. By actively promoting the value of mixed-method research, we can start to reshape the norms and expectations within our field.
Supporting the Next Generation: Encouragingly, younger researchers seem less confined by the quantitative-qualitative divide. They express interest in working on projects that utilize both methods, signaling a shift towards a more integrated approach to research. As experienced professionals, we should nurture this curiosity and provide opportunities for them to explore and learn from both methodologies.
By promoting a more integrated approach we can generate richer, more comprehensive insights. Ultimately, this will enable us to better serve our clients and more accurately represent the individuals and communities we study. This change may not be easy or quick, but its potential impact on our field - and the businesses and societies we serve - makes it a challenge worth pursuing.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Karen Lynch
Meet Michelle Auguste, NBA VP of Media Insights, driving strategy and revenue growth with 20+ years of media analytics expertise in sports entertainme...
Daniel Wu, founder of Nimbly, revolutionized market research with speed and empathy, starting from scratch to working with Fortune 100 brands.
Explore trends in consumer behavior, AI in market research, omni-channel shopping, and emerging tech...
Discover how Gen Z's digital fluency and shifting priorities are reshaping business, marketing, and work. Adapting to these trends keeps companies rel...
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.
67k+ subscribers