Categories
Research Methodologies
August 1, 2022
Ten survey questions that can improve survey engagement or spoil it.
Editor’s Note: This is the third installment of A Researcher Who Became a Respondent. Read part one and part two.
About six months ago, I saw an ad on Twitter for paid surveys and eagerly joined several online research panels. Since then, I consistently set aside time every day to take surveys in the name of research. Despite the ups and downs, it has been a fascinating journey that has helped me grow as a researcher.
One of the biggest “Aha!” moments for me was when I realized the wisdom of decoupling survey length from survey engagement. As researchers, we seem to be under the assumption that a survey under twenty minutes that is mobile-friendly will keep participants engaged and committed. But the reality is that brevity alone does not automatically yield a high engagement level. In fact, short surveys can still feel painfully long, tedious, and result in a high drop-off rate which makes the study more challenging to field.
While it is still true that the tenets of good design keep surveys short and mobile-friendly, there are far more factors to take into account when creating good survey questions. Having a “participant-first mindset” is key to improving the survey experience as a whole. The infographic below illustrates this point with five super survey questions that make the survey experience better, and five super awful questions that spoil it for everyone.
2CV RESEARCH
Much like TV shows and Tiktok videos, length is no indication of how engaging the experience will be. Short surveys are great, but they’re no magic formula for improving survey engagement.
As researchers, we need to balance our survey research needs with the participant experience. We know some surveys are more demanding by nature (e.g. conjoint, segmentation, etc) and those will not go away. But, having a “participant-first mindset” is key to achieving more thoughtful designs that will improve response rate and yield a high engagement level.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Karine Pepin
Explore five key truths about sampling, uncovering fraud, low-quality respondents, and transparency issues that have eroded data quality over two deca...
Learn key principles of content design that enable researchers to distill insights into assets, fostering stakeholder influence and sustainable busine...
Discover the challenge of identifying AI-generated open-ended responses and the potential consequences for researchers and the market research industr...
This article discusses how the online sampling ecosystem favors professional respondents and bad actors. It advocates for a transformative shift towar...
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.
67k+ subscribers