Research Technology (ResTech)

November 4, 2010

Scraping By

Andrew Jeavons comments on recent articles and debates on web privacy.

Andrew Jeavons

by Andrew Jeavons

Director Analytics at Signoi

The Wall Street Journal had a long article last week about the web and privacy. It chooses to dissect a company called TapLeaf and how it collates data on individuals which is then resold.

I feel slightly sorry for TapLeaf, they are getting more attention than I am sure they think they deserve. The truth is the whole “privacy” issue and the web is exploding, and I expect to see a lot more about this in the coming months. Pretty soon the government(s) will get involved, whether we like it or not. We have to hark back to the era when telephone research was king, it was great for a while, then all the calls got out of control. The government took notice. We can point fingers at the direct marketing industry, but we had a hand in it too. Eventually we got the “do not call” list and exemptions for MR, but it was a close thing.

Over the last couple of weeks there has been a long debate in a LinkedIn discussion group (“Text Analytics Professionals”) about the ethics of “screen scraping”, which is downloading or scraping information from websites for use in market research. A company called BuzzMetrics, owned by Nielsen, was caught scraping a website called “Patients Like Me”. It was against the terms of service (TOS) for the Patients Like Me (PLM) website. The debate has gone back and forth, there are those who feel anything on a website is “fair game”, there are those who disagree. Do you obey the TOS or ignore it ?

I think this debate is going to be irrelevant soon. Like it or not, as sure as night follows day, there will be more legislation about web privacy, and I would expect it to cover screen scraping. What the MR community have to do is to make sure it does not get side swiped by this. Social media is now hugely important to MR and we can expect the new rules, when ever they come, to cover information posted on social media. Complaining about the government(s) is all well and good, but we have to be part of the process. And there will be a process.

data privacyinnovationnielsensocial media text analytics

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Andrew Jeavons

Trust, Joy, Sadness and Fear: Primary Election Emotions in 2016
Brand Strategy

Trust, Joy, Sadness and Fear: Primary Election Emotions in 2016

Analyzing the tweets of the main political players in the run up to 3 significant primaries.

Deconstructing Twitter
Research Methodologies

Deconstructing Twitter

Using a corpus of tweets from the NewMR social media study, Andrew Jeavons analyzes the underlying characteristics of Twitter.

Safe Harbor: Is it safe?
Data Quality, Privacy, and Ethics

Safe Harbor: Is it safe?

There is a threat to Safe Harbor and it raises the specter of a world without a substantial Safe Harbor system

Why Recall Must Die: Capturing the Point of Emotion

Why Recall Must Die: Capturing the Point of Emotion

Most market researchers give little to no thought to their reliance on recall and, in doing so, fail to better understand respondents.

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers