Categories
Healthcare Insights Edge
November 11, 2024
Discover a new research tool that helps insights professionals analyze personal networks and understand the influence of connections on behavior and outcomes.
Years ago, when an increasing number of overloaded biopharma executives confessed they wanted to quit, I empathized. I’d burned out, too, and knew how they felt. All the work-life balance, time management, Seven Habits, fitness, and mindfulness hacks we used were necessary, but apparently, they were not sufficient. Was something missing?
I found an answer to that question in an unlikely place: a fashion magazine interview with Robert Downey, Jr. when he mentioned a “pit crew” of people supporting him. Curious about mine, I embarked on an ethnographic research adventure. First, I studied my own pit crew and used the data to improve my life. Then, I studied others,’ a story told in The NetworkSage: Realize Your Network Superpower.
Insights professionals who read the book suggested my approach was a new lens to help them understand people’s lives, be more empathetic, and contribute to their research with HCPs, patients, and caregivers. Some suggested that a person’s network configuration was as important as other attributes. Others saw it as a way to enrich their understanding of personas. Patient Journey and other studies we’ve done since have proven them right.
Robert Downey, Jr. identified four people in his “pit crew:” a yoga teacher, a sensei, a psychiatrist, and his wife. I identified 297 when I studied mine. Since then, in more than a decade of research with 1,000 children and adults, that list has grown to 7,000.
To improve the list's utility, I organized those 7,000 connection types into intuitive categories – not called “pit crews” because people rarely have that kind of support – but “networks.” Because this information architecture standardizes the connection nomenclature, it is helpful for case studies and other analytics. It also supports valid comparisons in the healthcare sector where I work across types of patients, caregivers, HCPs, disease conditions, and treatments, regardless of the nation or culture.
Understanding connections well is not a trivial concern. Humans are hard-wired to connect, not just with friends, family, or romantic partners but with others, too. The quality of those connections impacts every aspect of life and contributes to the outcomes of any endeavor. This is especially true when people face any kind of vulnerability and must navigate the journey for themselves or their loved ones.
Good connections have benefits: less anxiety, less post-surgical pain, and better recovery following heart attacks. Bad connections, on the other hand, interfere with sleep, increase hypertension and stress hormones, predict depression, chronic illness, and shorter lifespan.
Important for biopharma, connections can impact every step in the disease journey – and perhaps even the outcome – in ways we’ve not considered. For example, if someone has a depressed friend, their risk of depression increases. It goes even higher if both friends are female. If only one is treated and the medication is ineffective, is that a therapeutic failure, or might a “network effect” interfere with efficacy? Though that’s a researchable question, to the best of my knowledge, we don’t know the answer because that’s a question we’ve not known to ask until recently.
Also important for healthcare and product commercialization, the network determinants of health are far more actionable than Social Determinants of Health. The health sector cannot move patients to a better zip code to improve their health or ensure they graduate from high school. It can, however, leverage our understanding of networks – and teach patients to do likewise – to achieve better outcomes, as our research has demonstrated.
Network Analytics starts with understanding the two major network types: Life Networks and Event Networks.
Life Networks are enduring; people join them and stay for a long time. Parents create five – birthright networks – to meet a child’s basic needs. Children change these networks as they grow, but nobody outgrows the need for what they provide.
As we grow up, we progress through milestones considered markers of maturity: leaving home, finishing school, finding a mate, and becoming financially independent. As we do, we build three coming-of-age networks.
The other major type, Event Networks, is not enduring; it is episodic. These people help navigate an event, dispersing when we no longer need them. We expect some events: finding a job, having a wedding, buying a home, or moving to a new town. We don’t expect others, even when they are common: a house fire, an auto accident, storm damage, or a disease diagnosis.
When Life Networks are supportive, it is easier to navigate events because connections have useful information, referrals, helping hands, and listening ears. When Event Networks are supportive, it is easier to navigate the event successfully and avoid burning out those family, friends, and colleagues in our Life Networks.
We have not been taught to think this way about our lives or had tools to help, so this is a paradigm shift. Luckily, with a structure and approach to make it possible, focusing on connections and networks is simple and can produce powerful new insights. We hear often that it “…takes a village…” to raise a child. In truth, we all need one.
Case studies show how understanding villages can generate new insights for healthcare and other sectors, and I’ll share those in the future. My insights colleagues were right. Those missing pieces matter. They add to our understanding of people’s lives and provide us with new insights to share with clients.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Glenna Crooks, PhD
Bazis Americas uses Personal Network Analytics to study how bicultural networks influence care-seeking behavior, focusing on mental health care for de...
Discover how Personal Network Analytics can improve influenza vaccine messaging by uncovering insights to create more persuasive and effective communi...
Use Personal Network Analytics to position brands as superior, enabling premium pricing and market access in competitive markets or against generic co...
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.
67k+ subscribers
MM
Marcy Manning
November 13, 2024
This is an amazing article, full of new ways of looking at so many parts of life. Thank you, Glenna, for an article that will be applicable in many, many avenues and aspects of life!
TV
Tatiana V Barakshina
November 11, 2024
Glenna, your article highlights the potential of Network Architecture in market research beautifully. I can immediately see its applicability in areas like patient journey research, HCP and KOL communication studies, and segmentation research, as you’ve pointed out. With your approach, we can get deeper insights into complex relationships and behaviors. Thank you for sharing this practical AND and thought-provoking perspective!