Question 1

Does more visual attention always increase persuasion or likelihood to buy?

Accepted Answer

Just because an ad or design grabs more visual attention doesn't automatically mean it's more persuasive or more likely to drive a purchase. Attention is only the first step - people need to notice an ad before it can work, but what really matters is what they take away from it. For example, a flashy or provocative visual might catch someone's eye, yet if the message is unclear or unconvincing, the viewer won't be moved to buy. In some cases, overly attention-grabbing elements can even backfire by distracting from the product or creating a negative impression. The upshot: you need compelling content and relevant messaging behind the attention. When an ad balances eye-catching design with a clear value proposition and trust-building information, then the attention it earns is more likely to translate into persuasion and sales.

Question 2

When should DEI metrics be included in broader insights dashboards?

Accepted Answer

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) metrics should be integrated into broader insights dashboards whenever understanding demographic differences can inform decision-making or track progress on inclusion goals. If a company aims to reach diverse customer segments or ensure equitable experiences, metrics like audience representation, satisfaction by demographic group, or inclusivity indexes belong alongside the usual performance KPIs. For instance, a brand tracker might segment customer satisfaction or loyalty scores by ethnicity or gender to reveal if any group's experience consistently lags behind others — an insight missed without DEI data. Ideally, you incorporate DEI measures from the start of building a dashboard rather than adding them later, so they become a natural part of reporting. In practice, include DEI metrics any time you have sufficient data to break down results by group reliably; doing so highlights potential gaps or disparities and demonstrates a commitment to transparency on inclusion outcomes.

Question 3

Does usage telemetry improve calibrations for stated willingness-to-pay?

Accepted Answer

It can - combining usage telemetry with survey responses generally makes your willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates more accurate. Stated WTP from surveys is hypothetical, so it benefits from a reality check against how customers actually use and value the product. For example, if users claim they'd pay $50 for a service but the telemetry shows they barely use key features, you might discount their stated WTP as inflated. Conversely, if another segment uses the product heavily every day, they might actually be willing to pay more than they said on the survey (perhaps they underestimated their need). By feeding these behavioral cues into your analysis - say, weighting responses or adjusting price sensitivity based on engagement levels - you calibrate the WTP model to reflect real-world commitment. The result is pricing insights you can trust more: usage data helps flag over- or underestimations in stated willingness-to-pay, leading to a better-calibrated pricing strategy.

Question 4

Can AI tools reliably forecast long-term market shifts?

Accepted Answer

AI tools can detect emerging trends and model scenarios, but reliably forecasting long-term market shifts is still very difficult and usually requires human insight. Machine learning excels at short- to medium-term predictions when the future resembles the past, since it finds patterns in historical data. However, major market disruptions--like new technologies, regulatory upheavals, or cultural shifts--are game-changers that an AI might not anticipate if they weren't present in its training data. AI can crunch massive datasets and flag weak signals (such as subtle sentiment changes or nascent tech adoption), but those hints still need human interpretation for long-range planning. For a 5- or 10-year horizon, companies treat AI forecasts as one input among many: they combine data-driven scenarios with expert judgment and qualitative insights to account for unpredictable factors instead of relying solely on algorithms.

Question 5

Do high SUS scores always predict strong long-term retention?

Accepted Answer

High System Usability Scale (SUS) scores are a positive sign of an easy-to-use product, but they don't guarantee long-term user retention. A highly usable app could still struggle to retain users if it lacks compelling content or ongoing value beyond the initial ease of use. Retention often hinges on factors like the product's relevance to user needs, fresh features, and engagement strategies; an interface might score well on usability surveys, yet if users don't find long-term benefit or interest, they will drift away. For example, many novelty apps launch with great usability and receive high SUS ratings initially, but months later usage drops because the core offering wasn't strong enough. In short, usability is crucial, but sustaining user loyalty also requires continuous value delivery, evolving features, and understanding deeper user motivations.

Fletcher Knight, Inc.

Why choose Us

What is Fletcher Knight, Inc.?

Services and Expertise

Market Research FAQs with Expert Insights

Does more visual attention always increase persuasion or likelihood to buy?

When should DEI metrics be included in broader insights dashboards?

Does usage telemetry improve calibrations for stated willingness-to-pay?

Can AI tools reliably forecast long-term market shifts?

Do high SUS scores always predict strong long-term retention?