Research Methodologies

August 27, 2010

Another Unsuccessful Survey Invite…

Survey invites, much like online surveys, should be short, simple, and clear.

Sean Case

by Sean Case

Recently, I received an email survey invitation from a well-known panel company and was extremely disappointed at the abundance of common mistakes that were made. Email survey invitations are not dead, so why are we letting them fall by the wayside? In my opinion, survey invites, much like online surveys, should be short, simple, and clear. Although there is no standardized formula that guarantees your email efforts will result in better response rates, following those three words should at least result in the recipient to understand your email.

The Bad:

Forgetting spell check is forgivable…one time. In this specific survey invitation, there are not only typographical errors, but it appears that the author of this email does not speak English as a first language; and there is nothing encouraging about taking a survey that could potentially be full of even more errors.

Also, notice the incentive section – the description is very unclear. Will I receive 6,000, 10,000 or 16,000 points? Do I have the chance to win 3000 Euro or will 3 respondents win 1000 Euro?

Incentives are great. We continually offer them to our survey respondents as they are a proven method for increased response rates. However, the participant should know exactly what kind of incentive they are receiving and how they are going to receive their incentive. If not, you will quickly find that you have a number of disgruntled respondents.

The Lesson:

The goal of any email campaign is to generate a response to or interest in the subject matter without leaving room for unanswered questions. No recipient should need to re-read the email multiple times because it is too confusing. I, for one, do not have time for that. All this company needed to do was pay a little more attention to their survey invitation.

*This blog is not meant to undermine the data integrity of this company and we realize that no company can be perfect all the time.

incentivesonline surveyspanelsrespondent engagement

Comments

Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.

Disclaimer

The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.

More from Sean Case

The Model Respondent Comes with the Model Provider
Research Methodologies

The Model Respondent Comes with the Model Provider

As providers, it is our responsibility to provide quality participants and enable clients to accurately identify good and bad respondents.

The Partnership Between Research Buyer And Vendor
Insights Industry News

The Partnership Between Research Buyer And Vendor

From our experience as sample vendors, there have been times when price has been negotiated to fit a budget without fully understanding the specs, lea...

Sign Up for
Updates

Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.

67k+ subscribers