Categories
Focus on APAC
December 25, 2024
Channel your inner 5-year-old to innovate better! Use Associating, Questioning, Observing, Experimenting, and Networking for deeper insights and solutions.
“Children solve problems in a non-linear fashion, their magpie imaginations collecting, sorting, rearranging all those glittering daydreams into a nonsensical world they treasure.” – Erica Wolfe-Murray
What if, to advance with innovation capability, we simply need to go back to basics? What if we could harness that same innovative instinct, imagination, and mindset we had as kids?
I firmly believe in this philosophy. I even spoke about it in IIEX APAC this year and am re-sharing the key ideas.
At its core, innovation is about seeing the world of consumers with genuine curiosity, challenging norms, daring to ask what’s possible, and creating something new that uniquely and better solves real consumer problems. Yet despite billions of dollars invested, 70–90% of innovations fail. Why? It’s not for lack of trying, but often due mainly to poor market-product (or problem-solution) fit.
We as researchers are best positioned to help close that gap!
Most companies (and yes, even researchers) think that having a lot of data gives us good insights. The reality is most are data-rich but insights-poor. Uncovering actionable insights is hard, messy, and non-linear. The world’s most innovative companies embrace the mess, and experiments new ways to get deeper, more differentiated insights.
Take artificial intelligence, for instance. It’s not about using the shiniest AI tools. It is best used strategically to augment human speed and efficiency in discovering new insights. AI can inspire new ideas, accelerate idea incubation, and enhance marketing execution (Coca-Cola AI Christmas ad anyone?). Successful AI adoption pairs technology with the basics: well-defined business problem, clear hypotheses, and innovating for speed and efficiency.
Behind any successful innovation with strong market-product fit is a simple principle: A consumer is a person, not a datapoint.
Too often, we fall into the trap of taking abstract statistics and quant data as consumer truths. We forget they represent real humans with lives beyond our categories. Deep insights come from seeing the world through their eyes—understanding their goals, aspirations, and frustrations. This requires empathy, active listening, and the courage to imagine novel solutions that create meaningful difference in their lives.
If we as researchers and innovators feel stuck, we might need to remind ourselves of our inner 5-year-old. Kids are unfiltered thinkers. They are natural masters at solving problems with a mix of curiosity, observation, and play.
They:
These are the same critical innovation behaviors that Clay Christensen, Hal Gregersen and Jeffrey Dyer wrote about in the Innovators’ DNA.
As adults, we tend to lose these qualities, favoring structured methods over playful exploration. But what if we balanced both?
Insights and innovation work shouldn’t daunting. In fact, iterative, small-scale experiments often deliver the biggest wins. Here’s how an innovation team I coached approached a recent challenge to find organic yet disruptive innovation opportunities in low-growth, deflationary market:
The metrics and overwhelmingly positive feedback on the experience prove the power of creating a safe space for curiosity and collaboration to improve innovation results.
To elevate our roles as researchers and innovators, we must increase the value we create through our insights and solutions. Yes, we need to efficiently deploy our current best practices and continuously experiment with new tech-enabled tools and methods. But the biggest unlock is rigorously applying the basics: associating, observing, questioning, networking, and experimenting. And having fun! We need only to relive our 5-year-old selves!
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Val Pastrana
According to a BCG Henderson Institute study, 80% of companies have research functions that are largely under-leveraged. Part of the solution is trans...
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.
67k+ subscribers