Categories
September 19, 2012
The pejorative tone that many people associate with DIY raises a few thoughts…
By Ray Poynter
DIY – is it the word we don’t like?
Earlier today I was speaking with a conference organizer who was looking for client-side researchers to speak about DIY research and she is meeting quite a bit of resistance. As we talked through the issues, I identified two possible reasons.
1) In terms of classic DIY, for example SurveyMonkey, the main users within client organizations seem to be non-researchers, for example managers, NPD, and even C-suite people. In quite a few organizations the insights team are often the ones preaching against the methodological risks of people using SurveyMonkey. (BTW, the risks are usually nothing to do with the software, the risks they worry about are colleagues asking the wrong people, the wrong questions, and drawing the wrong inferences. Something which, some, market researchers feel is rare in ‘real’ market research, and common when research is conducted by others.)
2) Where insights teams are doing the research themselves they seem to be averse to using the term DIY. For example, many companies are using communities as part of their insight process, they are scripting surveys, they are running online discussions, and setting ethnographic-type quests. However, client-side researchers and managers seem loath to refer to this as DIY, as if DIY implies something cheap and nasty. This is perhaps not so surprising, if we think about people who are, genuinely, very good at building, gardening, car repairs, most of them would not describe themselves as DIYers, even when working at home.
The pejorative tone that many people associate with DIY raises three thoughts in my mind:
a) The MR industry could try to weaken the encroachment by non-research companies by referring to their survey and social media tools as DIY – something that already seems to be happening.
b) The organizations selling the tools should perhaps move away from a basic/premium split of their systems into a two brand approach, a DIY brand and a craftsman approach – which one or two seem to be doing.
c) If the product is cheap enough, easy enough, and good enough, the DIY brand might change people’s view of DIY or category – in the way that cars morphed from being a 99% service industry (people had chauffeurs) to a 99% DIY industry (most of us drive our own cars).
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Ray Poynter
Word Cloud Plus Extracts Hot Buzz Topics
The GRIT data collected toward the end of 2022 included 918 open-ended replies to the question “Related to insights, research, or analytics, which topics do you follow most closely and…
Observational data is a tempting shortcut for insights but researchers must consider its potential shortfalls
Using Prescriptive Analytics to navigate the data-filled world.
A deep dive into the very different experiences of the MRX community during COVID-19.
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.
67k+ subscribers