Categories
March 13, 2020
Concept testing with McDonald’s.
Editor’s Note: Insights That Work is a showcase of how the GRIT Top 50 Most Innovative Suppliers create solutions to some of the biggest challenges in insights today. This year’s edition provides case studies on brands like Nestle, Shell, Frito-Lay, and more.
Innovation and creativity are key to sustained success in the competitive quick-service restaurant market. McDonald’s has a continual need to launch new products that stand out compared to incumbents and startups. As competition has increased, the insights team needed to find a way to test faster, more cost-effectively, in a systematic fashion, and to build up a body of learning to support internal customers’ decision-making and continuous learning.
McDonald’s and Zappi worked together to evolve concept testing in terms of speed, standard audiences, markets, and methodologies. McDonald’s has used the MARC Rapid Results tool on the Zappi platform to test new concept iterations. Key parts of the solution included creating a custom tagging taxonomy, which classifies concepts across a variety of metrics or attributes and building a set of custom benchmark norms, which put all of the results in context. These have enabled McDonald’s to conduct a meta-analysis of results across concepts.
For instance, the company analyzed test results from a large number of different category concepts in order to learn which factors were the strongest drivers of Activation Potential (an aggregate measure proven to be predictive of in-market behavior) and highlight those elements in messaging and new product development. All test results are curated in the Zappi platform, which is accessible to all internal customers, making this kind of analysis very easy.
A higher profile for the insights team.
The insights team spends less time creating decks, and more time working directly in cross-functional teams, driving business improvements. Matt Cahill says, “We’ve started to do more iterations of tests on the same concept, to make it better. We can fit in a round of consumer input at almost any phase in the process now, which makes us much more in demand with our crossfunctional partners.”
Doing more with less with systematic market research.
Comments
Comments are moderated to ensure respect towards the author and to prevent spam or self-promotion. Your comment may be edited, rejected, or approved based on these criteria. By commenting, you accept these terms and take responsibility for your contributions.
Disclaimer
The views, opinions, data, and methodologies expressed above are those of the contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect or represent the official policies, positions, or beliefs of Greenbook.
More from Ryan Barry
Recapture the passion that brought you to market research.
Sign Up for
Updates
Get content that matters, written by top insights industry experts, delivered right to your inbox.
67k+ subscribers